raits may be singled out, traits that he shares with certain other people, and these used as a basis of understanding. Thus if a woman has a peculiarly shIn addition to socialization there are other factors that effect an individual and the relationship of these factors to the personality factor must be considered. In this matter, however, there is much confusion because of the perennial failure to distinguish between an abstraction and a concrete entity. One might as well discuss a book in terms of ideas versus ink, or plot versus format. The flesh-and-blood individual is unique, for there is none other exactly like him. To explain him in all his particularity would be a never-ending task that no one working as a scientist would attempt. Instead some of his traits may be singled out, traits that he shares with certain other people, and these used as a basis of understanding. Thus if a woman has a peculiarly shasidered. In this matter, however, there is much confusion because of the perennial failure to distinguish between an abstraction and a concrete entity. One might as well discuss a book in terms of ideas versus ink, or plot versus format. The flesh-and-blood individual is unique, for there is none other exactly like him. To explain him in all his particularity would be a never-ending task that no one working as a scientist would attempt. Instead some of his traits may be singled out, traits that he shares with certain other people, and these used as a basis of understanding. Thus if a woman has a peculiarly she might as well discuss a book in terms of ideas versus ink, or plot versus format. The flesh-and-blood individual is unique, for there is none other exactly like him. To explain him in all his particularity would be a never-ending task that no one working as a scientist would attempt. Instead some of his traits may be singled out, traits that he shares with certain other people, and these used as a basis of understanding. Thus if a woman has a peculiarly shtly like him. To explain him in all his particularity would be a never-ending task that no one working as a scientist would attempt. Instead some of his traits may be singled out, traits that he shares with certain other people, and these used as a basis of understanding. Thus if a woman has a peculiarly shraits may be singled out, traits that he shares with certain other people, and these used as a basis of understanding. Thus if a woman has a peculiarly shaped nose, one may find the explanation in the fact that certain of her ancestors exhibit a similarly shaped nose. But notice that one is already in the realm of abstraction. The woman's ancestors cannot have identically the same nose, because her nose is unique. They merely have similar noses.

Shape has been singled out for attention, and absolute size, complexion, powder, etc. have been ignored. Also, she and her ancestors have many other things in common in addition to nasal shape and genetic relationship. If genetic relationship has been picked out to explain the shape of the nose, the reason lies in