red. How convenient! I have myself read various reports about Bob Lazar, which quite easily reveals holes in many of his statements. The experts in these reports sound quite convincing, but then it's their job to be convincing. So either they were telling the truth that he was lying, or they were lying about his telling the truth. Hmmm.

There is yet another report that declares Area 51 may have concealed an illegal dump site on its premises for extremely toxic substances and that several people who once worked in the facility at Area 51 filed lawsuits against the US government concerning certain injuries and even deaths due to hazardous materials. Unfortunately, the government is legally protected from such lawsuits; besides, it also continues the denial of the existence of any facility or place known as Area 51. There

There is a typical conspiracy theory rumor that tells us the military and government intelligence operations are set up so that the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing; one department is working on one aspect of a large confidential project, and another department is working on yet another. You would think this would cause confusion -- and it does for the typical pawns. But not for the bigwigs on top; they seem to know exactly what they're doing -- or do they?

This is the usual scenario: a specialized scientist was brought into one of these top-secret projects, at Area 51 for instance, and he was told to analyze an advanced experimental Soviet aircraft they procured (incidentally, this was back when we had a Soviet Union!), but they couldn't tell him where they found it or they would have to kill him -- or something to scare him. More than likely they would have to trick him via a loyalty oath, possibly binding by imprisonment -- if not death. Death threats are so intriguing and invigorating, aren't they? Only in spy thrillers I suppose. Anyway, as he explored and analyzed the mysterious craft, the scientist was perplexed about its seemingly alien nature, because it involved technology beyond his understanding. Once he completed his study of the bizarre craft and reported his analysis, his assignment was concluded, and being told to keep silent about this whole episode, he was sent back into the “real world” where the public is told that UFOs are only hoaxes. But being no dummy, usually after a few decades of sulking, he decided to become a whistleblower and expose the whole thing, because he was “the man who knew too much.” And of course, the government would desperately deny his validity, making him sound like just another crackpot -- and believe me, there are many of them!

Conspiracy theorists have associated various highly classified projects to Area 51, not only for the research and reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial spacecrafts, but for the examination of captured aliens (dead or alive!), time travel research, the development of advanced weapons, a secret base for MJ-12, and other fascinating possibilities. How much of this is true is uncertain. I believe dark secrets about Area 51 will always exist, even if this clandestine place doesn't.

One thing is for sure; we’ll find numerous whistleblowers and conspiracy nuts out there bumbling around. The question is, can we tell the difference between the two? Here's a good example. There once was a man named Bob Lazar, who was either a genuine whistleblower or a far-fetched conspiracy propagator, who claimed to be a legitimate scientist who had examined and worked on extraterrestrial spacecrafts at a mysterious place called S-4 at Papoose Lake, just south of Area 51. This supposedly took place in 1989, and if he accomplished anything, it was popularizing all these grand conspiracy theories connected to Area 51. He himself claimed to have participated in the reverse-engineering of alien flying saucers in order to advance our own military aircrafts. Many experts claim he was merely disseminating big lies. They said he blatantly lied about being a real scientist or having attended any universities whatsoever. Plus he claimed his birth certificate and Ph.D. diploma had mysteriously disappeared. How convenient! I have myself read various reports about Bob Lazar, which quite easily reveals holes in many of his statements. The experts in these reports sound quite convincing, but then it's their job to be convincing. So either they were telling the truth that he was lying, or they were lying about his telling the truth. Hmmm.

There is yet another report that declares Area 51 may have concealed an illegal dump site on its premises for extremely toxic substances and that several people who once worked in the facility at Area 51 filed lawsuits against the US government concerning certain injuries and even deaths due to hazardous materials. Unfortunately, the government is legally protected from such lawsuits; besides, it also continues the denial of the existence of any facility or place known as Area 51. Theref

ill him -- or something to scare him. More than likely they would have to trick him via a loyalty oath, possibly binding by imprisonment -- if not death. Death threats are so intriguing and invigorating, aren't they? Only in spy thrillers I suppose. Anyway, as he explored and analyzed the mysterious craft, the scientist was perplexed about its seemingly alien nature, because it involved technology beyond his understanding. Once he completed his study of the bizarre craft and reported his analysis, his assignment was concluded, and being told to keep silent about this whole episode, he was sent back into the “real world” where the public is told that UFOs are only hoaxes. But being no dummy, usually after a few decades of sulking, he decided to become a whistleblower and expose the whole thing, because he was “the man who knew too much.” And of course, the government would desperately deny his validity, making him sound like just another crackpot -- and believe me, there are many of them!

Conspiracy theorists have associated various highly classified projects to Area 51, not only for the research and reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial spacecrafts, but for the examination of captured aliens (dead or alive!), time travel research, the development of advanced weapons, a secret base for MJ-12, and other fascinating possibilities. How much of this is true is uncertain. I believe dark secrets about Area 51 will always exist, even if this clandestine place doesn't.

One thing is for sure; we’ll find numerous whistleblowers and conspiracy nuts out there bumbling around. The question is, can we tell the difference between the two? Here's a good example. There once was a man named Bob Lazar, who was either a genuine whistleblower or a far-fetched conspiracy propagator, who claimed to be a legitimate scientist who had examined and worked on extraterrestrial spacecrafts at a mysterious place called S-4 at Papoose Lake, just south of Area 51. This supposedly took place in 1989, and if he accomplished anything, it was popularizing all these grand conspiracy theories connected to Area 51. He himself claimed to have participated in the reverse-engineering of alien flying saucers in order to advance our own military aircrafts. Many experts claim he was merely disseminating big lies. They said he blatantly lied about being a real scientist or having attended any universities whatsoever. Plus he claimed his birth certificate and Ph.D. diploma had mysteriously disappeared. How convenient! I have myself read various reports about Bob Lazar, which quite easily reveals holes in many of his statements. The experts in these reports sound quite convincing, but then it's their job to be convincing. So either they were telling the truth that he was lying, or they were lying about his telling the truth. Hmmm.

There is yet another report that declares Area 51 may have concealed an illegal dump site on its premises for extremely toxic substances and that several people who once worked in the facility at Area 51 filed lawsuits against the US government concerning certain injuries and even deaths due to hazardous materials. Unfortunately, the government is legally protected from such lawsuits; besides, it also continues the denial of the existence of any facility or place known as Area 51. There

oo much.” And of course, the government would desperately deny his validity, making him sound like just another crackpot -- and believe me, there are many of them!

Conspiracy theorists have associated various highly classified projects to Area 51, not only for the research and reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial spacecrafts, but for the examination of captured aliens (dead or alive!), time travel research, the development of advanced weapons, a secret base for MJ-12, and other fascinating possibilities. How much of this is true is uncertain. I believe dark secrets about Area 51 will always exist, even if this clandestine place doesn't.

One thing is for sure; we’ll find numerous whistleblowers and conspiracy nuts out there bumbling around. The question is, can we tell the difference between the two? Here's a good example. There once was a man named Bob Lazar, who was either a genuine whistleblower or a far-fetched conspiracy propagator, who claimed to be a legitimate scientist who had examined and worked on extraterrestrial spacecrafts at a mysterious place called S-4 at Papoose Lake, just south of Area 51. This supposedly took place in 1989, and if he accomplished anything, it was popularizing all these grand conspiracy theories connected to Area 51. He himself claimed to have participated in the reverse-engineering of alien flying saucers in order to advance our own military aircrafts. Many experts claim he was merely disseminating big lies. They said he blatantly lied about being a real scientist or having attended any universities whatsoever. Plus he claimed his birth certificate and Ph.D. diploma had mysteriously disappeared. How convenient! I have myself read various reports about Bob Lazar, which quite easily reveals holes in many of his statements. The experts in these reports sound quite convincing, but then it's their job to be convincing. So either they were telling the truth that he was lying, or they were lying about his telling the truth. Hmmm.

There is yet another report that declares Area 51 may have concealed an illegal dump site on its premises for extremely toxic substances and that several people who once worked in the facility at Area 51 filed lawsuits against the US government concerning certain injuries and even deaths due to hazardous materials. Unfortunately, the government is legally protected from such lawsuits; besides, it also continues the denial of the existence of any facility or place known as Area 51. There

s a good example. There once was a man named Bob Lazar, who was either a genuine whistleblower or a far-fetched conspiracy propagator, who claimed to be a legitimate scientist who had examined and worked on extraterrestrial spacecrafts at a mysterious place called S-4 at Papoose Lake, just south of Area 51. This supposedly took place in 1989, and if he accomplished anything, it was popularizing all these grand conspiracy theories connected to Area 51. He himself claimed to have participated in the reverse-engineering of alien flying saucers in order to advance our own military aircrafts. Many experts claim he was merely disseminating big lies. They said he blatantly lied about being a real scientist or having attended any universities whatsoever. Plus he claimed his birth certificate and Ph.D. diploma had mysteriously disappeared. How convenient! I have myself read various reports about Bob Lazar, which quite easily reveals holes in many of his statements. The experts in these reports sound quite convincing, but then it's their job to be convincing. So either they were telling the truth that he was lying, or they were lying about his telling the truth. Hmmm.

There is yet another report that declares Area 51 may have concealed an illegal dump site on its premises for extremely toxic substances and that several people who once worked in the facility at Area 51 filed lawsuits against the US government concerning certain injuries and even deaths due to hazardous materials. Unfortunately, the government is legally protected from such lawsuits; besides, it also continues the denial of the existence of any facility or place known as Area 51. There

red. How convenient! I have myself read various reports about Bob Lazar, which quite easily reveals holes in many of his statements. The experts in these reports sound quite convincing, but then it's their job to be convincing. So either they were telling the truth that he was lying, or they were lying about his telling the truth. Hmmm.

There is yet another report that declares Area 51 may have concealed an illegal dump site on its premises for extremely toxic substances and that several people who once worked in the facility at Area 51 filed lawsuits against the US government concerning certain injuries and even deaths due to hazardous materials. Unfortunately, the government is legally protected from such lawsuits; besides, it also continues the denial of the existence of any facility or place known as Area 51. Therefore, if this place does not exist, no such workers could have been working there to even be exposed to such hazardous chemicals, right? Clearly these harmful chemicals don't exist in a place that likewise does not exist. Either that or the government is very clever with all its mind-numbing cover-ups. I suppose the government is above the law if it can’t be properly sued, even when it is obviously in the wrong. What? No, I'm not suggesting our government is corrupt, not at all! I'm just saying it's always in the right -- even when it's wrong.

Some reports say these top-secret projects had been stealthily moved elsewhere, possibly after 1997, which would account for the declassification of the existence of Area 51, which theoretically means no classified agendas exist there any longer. That would mean the very heart and soul have been ripped out of the legendary Area 51, leaving it desolate now. If that's the case, where are these highly classified projects taking place now? Some new facility whose location remains secret?

My question is, if there ever was an “official” Area 51, although the government has stubbornly denied it, is it possible that it really DOESN’T exist? Is it possible that it merely serves as a diversion to conceal a deeper secret: Area 52?